(i) = incumbent
(c) = challenger
....................................
Remember to vote on Nov. 2!!
Daniel L. Griffith
Daniel L. Griffith
Born: 1962 in Big Fork, MN
Education:
Falls High School - 1980
Rainy River Community College - A.A. 1985
University of Minnesota - B.A. 1988
William Mitchell College of Law - J.D. 1993
Employment:
1996-present, GRIFFITH LAW OFFICE -- Started private law practice focusing
on criminal, family, probate and environmental law.
1994-1996, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE -- THE BOYLE LAW FIRM Assistant City Attorney--Prosecuted
criminal matters and practiced personal injury, family, real estate and probate
law.
1993 GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A., Law Clerk--Covered environmental
issues during the 1993 Minnesota Legislative Session and drafted a weekly
report, which was disseminated to Gray, Plant business clients.
Summer 1992, HUMMEL, SINCLAIR, PEARSON, EVANS, HUNT & HEISLER, P.A.
Law Clerk - Drafted two appellate briefs and completed several assignments
for the Becker County Attorney stationed in that office. Researched a variety
of legal issues, wrote memorandums, and offered support for trials and hearings.
Spring 1992, DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, HUDSON, WISCONSIN
Law Clerk/Intern - Researched a variety of legal issues, wrote memorandums,
and assisted in trials and hearings.
Fall 1991 MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE
Law Clerk/Intern - Researched a variety of legal issues, wrote memorandums,
and assisted in trials and hearings.
Summary Experience:
Attorney - 11 years
Assistant City Attorney - 2 years
Assistant County Attorney by appointment - 7 years
Criminal Defense - 7 years
General Practice - probate, civil, personal injury, environmental, property
10 years experience on cases involving families and children
Guardian Ad Litem - 9 years
1996-present, RAINY RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Adjunct Professor on request - Taught Criminal Justice, International Relations,
Political Science and Business Law
1983 and 1984, MINNESOTA STATE SENATE
Senate Page - Served as an aid to Senators. Worked both the 1983 and 1984
legislative sessions.
Bar Admissions:
Minnesota Supreme Court Bar -1993
Federal District Court Bar - 2000
Federal Court of Appeals - 1997
Bois Forte Tribal Court - 2001
Bar Activities:
Koochiching County Bar Association - past President
Minnesota State Bar Association
Civic Activities:
Community Theatre and Music
Red Cross Volunteer and former Board Member
Radio Station KBHW Board Member
Church Board Member
Children’s Justice Initiative Committee Member
Friends Against Abuse former Board Member
Life Care Center Board Member
Personal:
My wife Debbie and I have been married for 13 years and have four children; Marco, 10; Peter, 6; Joey, 5; and David, 2.
Hobbies: Antiques, Reading, History, Biking, Fishing and Hunting, Wrestling,
Motorcycles, and Cross Country Skiing
Military Service: US Army; I currently seek a position in the Minnesota
National Guard JAG
Candidacy Questions:
1. Why do you want to be a judge?
It is the judge’s job to find the truth, find the facts, and follow the rule
of law. Justice is the paramount duty of a judge, but not necessarily the job
of a lawyer. That is one of the major reasons I want to serve as a judge.
2. Why should voters select you rather than your opponent in the upcoming election?
If I am granted the privilege of serving as a judge I will stay within the constitutional boundaries of a judicial officer and work to provide fairness and justice to all who come before the court. I wish my opponent the best. He was appointed to this position back when the Court of Appeals was first created in this state. I do not expect him to remain as a judge much longer since he is already at the age that most people retire. If he were to retire in the middle of his term (which is a common practice on this court), then we would have another political appointee. I believe our judges would serve our state better if they were accountable to the people they are to serve through open elections rather than mid-term appointments.
3. What experience have you had in dealing with the court on which you wish
to sit?
I have been an attorney for 11 years. When I was a law clerk I drafted two appellate
briefs that went to our Court of Appeals. I also appealed four cases on my own
after I became an attorney and one to the Minnesota Supreme Court. My clients
prevailed on two cases and did not prevail on two others. In addition, I drafted
and argued an amicus curiae brief before the Federal Court of Appeals and represented
clients in Federal District Court.
4. What are the major issues facing the court on which you wish to serve? How can these realistically be addressed?
Fundamentally the court must provide justice and the people must have confidence
that it will do so. I believe for the court to meet this important mandate it
must be accountable to the people it is judging. Lord Acton said, "Power
corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Our government was established
under a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of government
or group of people could subjugate the others. Encouraging the judiciary’s independence,
but tempering that independence with accountability can accomplish this important
charge.
5. Do you believe it is good policy to discuss disputed legal and political issues during a judicial campaign? If so, what issues do you plan to discuss and why. If not, why shouldn't such issues be discussed?
I believe that the voters should be able to ask judicial candidates what they want. How else can they make an informed decision to vote for one candidate over another?
6. What else, if anything, would you like the voters to know about your candidacy that you have not discussed so far?
I will answer any questions they have that the rules will allow. Both the client and their lawyer need to know that they will receive a fair and impartial hearing before the court. That is what I will give them if I am granted this office.