Child Support Modification
Where father moved for a reduction in his child support obligation based on a downturn in income from the mortgage business; mother argued that father is manipulating his income, has not reduced his expensive lifestyle and has the ability to earn more than he claims he has recently earned; and the District Court summarily concluded that a substantial change in circumstances occurred, and did not find that the original support obligation was unreasonable and unfair; we conclude that the record and findings are inadequate to permit appellate review of the District Court’s order reducing child support.
In addition, the replacement health insurance that father obtained, with a $5,000 deductible, does not meet the requirement in the decree that father provide coverage “the same or comparable” to that provided during the marriage. Reversed and remanded.
