<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
<title>Minnesota Lawyer News</title>
<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/all.rss</link>
<description>The latest News updates from Minnesota Lawyer</description>
<language>en-us</language> 
<copyright>Copyright 2010, Minnesota Lawyer.</copyright> 
		
		<item>
			<title>SENTENCING  - Prior Conviction; Identification</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/SENTENCING---Prior-Conviction-Identification</link>
			<description>
				Where the government presented evidence including the name, height, weight, age and tattoos, that identified a defendant as the person named in a prior conviction, the records were sufficient to connect the defendant to the earlier conviction for purposes of sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Judgment is affirmed.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:30:30 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>SENTENCING  - Child Pornography; Enhancements</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/SENTENCING---Child-Pornography-Enhancements</link>
			<description>
				Where a defendant in a child pornography case objected to a four-level enhancement for sadistic or masochistic images because the pornography he produced was not sadistic or violent although he did possess such images, the District Court stated that the ultimate sentence would have been the same without the enhancement so any procedural error was harmless, and the 470-month sentence was not an abuse of discretion, and the court also did not commit procedural error in sentencing defendant&amp;rsquo;s wife to 360 months. Judgment is affirmed.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:28:08 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Evidence - Jury Instructions</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Evidence--Jury-Instructions</link>
			<description>
				1. The District Court did not commit plain error in its jury instructions regarding relationship evidence and past-pattern-of-domestic-abuse evidence.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:46:56 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>A dispute may be in the pipeline between state, Xcel</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/A-dispute-may-be-in-the-pipeline-between-state-Xcel</link>
			<description>
				The Minnesota Office of Pipeline Safety, the state agency investigating a gas explosion that blew up a St. Paul home, is growing frustrated with Xcel Energy and says the company could be doing a better job pulling together documents for the investigation and working to solve the problem that caused the explosion.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ABA sides with law school</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/ABA-sides-with-law-school</link>
			<description>
				In a Supreme Court battle between the right of a law school to enforce rules barring discrimination and students&amp;rsquo; First Amendment right to free association, the American Bar Association has taken the side of the law school.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Administrative - Disqualification from Direct Care</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Administrative--Disqualification-from-Direct-Care</link>
			<description>
				Where petitioner was convicted of a felony forgery in 1999 and a felony issuance of a dishonored check in 2004; petitioner sought reconsideration on the grounds that she posed no risk of harm because her work involved caring for her son, who is physically but not mentally impaired, and she would not steal from him; check forgery and issuance of a dishonored check are among felonies that require a fifteen-year disqualification; less than five years had elapsed from the 2004 conviction to the commissioner&amp;rsquo;s determination; petitioner did not provide evidence of rehabilitation after the offenses;&amp;nbsp; and although petitioner&amp;rsquo;s employer provided a letter of support, the record does not demonstrate that the employer knew the details of petitioner&amp;rsquo;s convictions; we conclude that the commissioner properly sustained petitioner&amp;rsquo;s disqualification from employment as a personal-care attendant providing direct-contact care, but we note that petitioner&amp;nbsp; could seek a variance that would allow her to provide direct care limited only to her son.&amp;nbsp; 
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>APPELLATE PRACTICE - Interlocutory Review; Rule 54(b) Certification; Finality of Judgment</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/APPELLATE-PRACTICE--Interlocutory-Review-Rule-54b-Certification-Finality-of-Judgment</link>
			<description>
				Where an inmate brought a civil rights action against various prison-official defendants and the parties sought interlocutory review, entering a stipulation in which the inmate agreed to dismiss his one remaining claim without prejudice and to reinstate it if he should prevail on appeal of any of the dismissed claims, the parties attempted to &amp;ldquo;manufacture&amp;rdquo; appellate jurisdiction and the District Court abused its discretion by certifying the case for appeal without an adequate explanation that there was &amp;ldquo;no just reason for delay&amp;rdquo; under Rule 54(b). Appeal is dismissed.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Attorney Discipline - Mitigating and Aggravating Factors</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Attorney-Discipline--Mitigating-and-Aggravating-Factors</link>
			<description>
				1. The referee&amp;rsquo;s findings that the attorney&amp;rsquo;s adjustment disorder, the time elapsed since his last instance of misconduct causing harm to a client, his good reputation in the legal community, the favorable results he achieved for clients in complex matters, and his cooperation with the Director were not mitigating factors were not clearly erroneous.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Bar Buzz - March 22</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Bar-Buzz--March-22</link>
			<description>
				&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;Is God in charge of the appointment of the next chief justice? &lt;/span&gt;
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Bill looks at role of pets in domestic abuse</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Bill-looks-at-role-of-pets-in-domestic-abuse</link>
			<description>
				State lawmakers are considering a bill that would extend domestic violence protections to pets.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Capital Gains  - Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Capital-Gains---Deed-in-Lieu-of-Foreclosure</link>
			<description>
				&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;o:OfficeDocumentSettings&gt;   &lt;o:RelyOnVML/&gt;   &lt;o:AllowPNG/&gt;  &lt;/o:OfficeDocumentSettings&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:WordDocument&gt;   &lt;w:View&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:Zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:TrackMoves/&gt;   &lt;w:TrackFormatting/&gt;   &lt;w:PunctuationKerning/&gt;   &lt;w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/&gt;   &lt;w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:DoNotPromoteQF/&gt;   &lt;w:LidThemeOther&gt;EN-US&lt;/w:LidThemeOther&gt;   &lt;w:LidThemeAsian&gt;X-NONE&lt;/w:LidThemeAsian&gt;   &lt;w:LidThemeComplexScript&gt;X-NONE&lt;/w:LidThemeComplexScript&gt;   &lt;w:Compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:BreakWrappedTables/&gt;    &lt;w:SnapToGridInCell/&gt;    &lt;w:WrapTextWithPunct/&gt;    &lt;w:UseAsianBreakRules/&gt;    &lt;w:DontGrowAutofit/&gt;    &lt;w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/&gt;    &lt;w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp/&gt;    &lt;w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables/&gt;    &lt;w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/&gt;    &lt;w:Word11KerningPairs/&gt;    &lt;w:CachedColBalance/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;m:mathPr&gt;    &lt;m:mathFont m:val=&quot;Cambria Math&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:brkBin m:val=&quot;before&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:brkBinSub m:val=&quot;&amp;#45;-&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:smallFrac m:val=&quot;off&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:dispDef/&gt;    &lt;m:lMargin m:val=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:rMargin m:val=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:defJc m:val=&quot;centerGroup&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:wrapIndent m:val=&quot;1440&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:intLim m:val=&quot;subSup&quot;/&gt;    &lt;m:naryLim m:val=&quot;undOvr&quot;/&gt;   &lt;/m:mathPr&gt;&lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:LatentStyles DefLockedState=&quot;false&quot; DefUnhideWhenUsed=&quot;true&quot;   DefSemiHidden=&quot;true&quot; DefQFormat=&quot;false&quot; DefPriority=&quot;99&quot;   LatentStyleCount=&quot;267&quot;&gt;   &lt;w:LsdException Locked=&quot;false&quot; Priority=&quot;0&quot; SemiHidden=&quot;false&quot;    UnhideWhenUsed=&quot;false&quot; QFormat=&quot;true&quot; Name=&quot;Normal&quot;/&gt;   &lt;w:LsdException Locked=&quot;false&quot; Priority=&quot;9&quot; SemiHidden=&quot;false&quot;    UnhideWhenUsed=&quot;false&quot; QFormat=&quot;true&quot; Name=&quot;heading 1&quot;/&gt;   &lt;w:LsdException Locked=&quot;false&quot; Priority=&quot;9&quot; QFormat=&quot;true&quot; Name=&quot;heading 2&quot;/&gt;   &lt;w:LsdException Locked=&quot;false&quot; Priority=&quot;9&quot; QFormat=&quot;true&quot; Name=&quot;heading 3&quot;/&gt;
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Civil Procedure - Objection to Standing</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Civil-Procedure--Objection-to-Standing</link>
			<description>
				Where a title company questioned the standing of an insurer as an alleged subrogee; and the standing issue was raised at the damages trial, after the District Court had entered partial summary judgment as to liability; we conclude that the District Court did not err in determining that the objections was untimely because the lateness of the title company&amp;rsquo;s standing objection unjustly prejudiced the insurer&amp;rsquo;s ability to respond.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>CIVIL RIGHTS  - Fair Housing Act; Sexual Harassment; Punitive Damages</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/CIVIL-RIGHTS---Fair-Housing-Act-Sexual-Harassment-Punitive-Damages</link>
			<description>
				(1)Where a tenant sued her landlord under the Fair Housing Act for sexual harassment, discrimination and intimidation, a claim for hostile housing environment created by sexual harassment is actionable under the FHA, and sufficient evidence supported a jury verdict for the plaintiff on her claims of hostile environment, &amp;ldquo;quid pro quo&amp;rdquo; sexual harassment, coercion and sex discrimination.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Column: Revisiting client visits</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Column-Revisiting-client-visits</link>
			<description>
				I have often written about the importance of meeting with and talking to your clients. As business starts to show hints of thawing and warming up, now is a good time to revisit the issue of client visits.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Confrontation Clause rights denied, Supreme Court orders retrial</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Confrontation-Clause-rights-denied-Supreme-Court-orders-retrial</link>
			<description>
				The Minnesota Supreme Court has determined that the admission of grand jury testimony of a potential state witness who expressed reluctance to testify at trial, was released from a subpoena and did not testify at trial, violated the defendant&amp;rsquo;s Confrontation Clause rights.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Connollys Corner: Outtakes from the Hennepin Bar Foundation benefit</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Connollys-Corner-Outtakes-from-the-Hennepin-Bar-Foundation-benefit</link>
			<description>
				U.S. District Court Judge Anne Montgomery stopped in on her way to Tanzania, where she is teaching African prosecutors the fine art of witnesses giving live testimony. They rely now only on reading aloud from what is submitted in writing. Later, Tom Johnson, Gray Plant, mentioned that his son, Ben Johnson, is in Tanzania working with Global Volunteers. Our paths weave. 
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Consent decree approved in pregnancy case</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Consent-decree-approved-in-pregnancy-case</link>
			<description>
				Chief Judge Michael J. Davis of U.S. District Court in Minneapolis has approved a consent decree settling a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against St. Paul-based White Way Cleaners.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Constitutional Law - Confrontation Clause</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Constitutional-Law--Confrontation-Clause</link>
			<description>
				A violation of the Confrontation Clause warranted a new trial.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Contracts - Fraud in Execution</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Contracts--Fraud-in-Execution</link>
			<description>
				1. Fraud in the execution is a statement or conduct that misrepresents the character or essential terms of a proposed contract, and that induces an apparent manifestation of assent by one who neither knows nor has reasonable opportunity to know of the character or essential terms of the proposed contract.
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Contracts - Notice of Default</title>
			<link>http://www.minnlawyer.com/article.cfm/2010/03/22/Contracts--Notice-of-Default</link>
			<description>
				Where the parties&amp;rsquo; loan agreement provided that a notice of default would be effective &amp;ldquo;if mailed, when deposited in the United States mail, as first class, certified or registered mail postage prepaid&amp;rdquo;; and the lender gave notice of default by depositing in the United States mail, first class, letters to the borrower at the address stated on the loan documents; we conclude that the District Court did not err in granting summary judgment for the lender because the unambiguous language of the agreement allowed the lender to provide notice by depositing the notice in the mail as first class, and the lender followed that procedure in notifying the borrower of its default. 
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
